By: Michael Barata
When we talk about what should be important within an organization, we drive home focusing on results and results only. With regard to work, results should be what drive an employee to succeed and should be what’s used to measure an employee’s performance.
However, a ROWE is not designed to be soulless. Within a ROWE, work does not take precedence over one’s life, but rather YOU gain control of your life. This is vital to remember. Essentially, results to an organization can be likened to balance in one’s life.
Have you ever had to deal with a wandering mind, illness, or personal trauma when attempting to accomplish something personal? Whether it be a mundane chore around the house or attending a social event or trying to enjoy a hobby, you simply do not feel “into” or focused on the moment. What do you do?
Now apply any of those circumstances to work. What do you do? What does your organization do to help you achieve results, but more importantly, support your well-being? Personal days, vacation days, sick days, and bereavement periods are the common, traditional work environment’s response to such situations. This approach is absurd because it is so mechanical. There is no distinction made among employees. The assumption is all employees enjoy the same amount of personal time, get sick for the same amount of time, and grieve the same way.
The employee is viewed as a commodity with allotted downtime instead of a unique person who may benefit from a variety of options. This is an example of how a ROWE truly separates itself from other cultures or feel-good strategies.
Awhile back, Brett Legree contacted Cali & Jody about his interest in ROWE and shared some personal stories. One event he shared was so moving that with Brett’s permission, we felt it necessary to share it with all of you. You can find the details of this event in his own words here.
I strongly urge you to read his story. What Brett and his wife endured was a very difficult pregnancy in which they lost two of three triplets to complications. Such a personal tragedy as this is not one that can be relieved through anything written in an employee manual. This is something that the unique person must deal with and overcome.
Brett went back to work, but he acknowledged his mind was elsewhere. His work was not suffering, but he admits his progress had slowed. He turned to the internet to seek some help for what he was going through. He would access the net while at work, which created an issue as Brett’s company had a policy clarifying surfing the internet at work must be for “work-related purposes only” and only for 90 minutes a month. He exceeded the allowed time and the sites he was visiting were deemed not “work-related.” This was addressed with him. Well, he was actually reprimanded for it and informed he could be fired for it.
Brett’s take on the circumstances surrounding why he was surfing the internet is brilliant. He asks, “One supposes that the sanity of an employee is work-related, right?” We believe that is 100% right!
Brett forged on even after being written up for excessive internet use and his supervisor referenced “family trouble” as the reason. That did not deter Brett. As he dealt with his sadness, he got faster at his job and also added improvements. He even beat his target times for the year. Then came his annual appraisal. Though his accomplishments were noted, his abuse of the internet rang louder than anything else. His achievements took a back seat to a childish scolding about internet use.
That’s shameful.
This impersonal approach to how employees are treated is not only cold, but hypocritical, too. How often do you hear “We are family-friendly here.” or “Treat your coworker like your neighbor.” Yet, whenever you do engage in family or neighborly activities with coworkers, like a conversation about the weekend or sharing pictures of the latest family vacation, you typically get reprimanded for socializing or being out of your normal work area.
Brett experienced even more negativity when he moved on to another project and supervisor. This supervisor told him she would have never hired him if she had known about his internet abuses.
That’s just insulting. The guy was dealing with tremendous hurt BUT exceeded expectations anyway.
Unfortunately, Brett is not in the minority with this kind of professional experience. This demeaning approach to managing people is experienced every day by countless employees. No one is asking for preferential treatment, but rather respect. No one is asking for less accountability, but rather more trust. No one wants a family or neighborly atmosphere at work, but rather the freedom to be with family and neighbors when they choose.
Brett realized what is most important to him and they are his interests and those of his family.
A ROWE empowers the individual to determine what is important – not a supervisor or an organization. So, what is most important to you? And how are you going to make 2010 the year you start really focusing on that?

