9 Ways to Kill Job Performance

Our philosophy about work has always been focused on one thing: results. Where and when work gets done is entrusted to each employee. And trust us, employees will perform and deliver amazing results with this freedom. Sadly, many businesses who are operating under the old model of work are still doing these 9 things that kill job performance.

1. Fussing over flexibility.

We’ve read so many articles lately about flexibility–why it’s good and bad, how to control it, who gets it, women will take less money to have it (what?!). It’s crazy. The conversation has to change. Let employees decide how, where, and when they work. Stop fussing about flexibility and start focusing on results.

2. Carrots and sticks.

The science is in: intrinsic motivation rules. But “there’s a mismatch between what science tells us and what business does,” says author Daniel Pink. In this video, Pink says that instrinsic motivators are the most powerful for human beings. However, typical business practices use carrots and sticks (extrinsic motivators). For 20th century tasks, that worked just fine. But for 21st century cognitive tasks, if-then rewards do not work and sometimes work against us. The new operating system for business revolves around autonomy, mastery, and purpose. You have to watch the video all the way through. It’s amazing.

3. Commuting.

There’s no way around it. Long, daily commutes are bad for people in every way: environmentally, physically, and emotionally. Not only is daily commuting unproductive, unhealthy, and stressful–it’s bad for job performance! The traffic fumes inhaled during regular commuting takes a measurable toll on mental capacity, intelligence, and emotional stability.

4. Slowing down young talent.

Kids these days. They want to choose when, where, and how they work! Does that thought terrify you? It shouldn’t if you focus on results. Are they getting the work done? If not, they don’t have a job. Is your workplace set up for that kind of trust and freedom? If the answer is no, your young talent may go work for your competitor.

5. Stress at work, stress at home.

High levels of stress make you careless and unable to concentrate. Bad news for job performance. We know that when employees are empowered and trusted to deliver results, they have less stress.

6. Creativity zapper.

Did you know that doing the same thing over and over again, day after day, zaps your creativity? Studies show that there is a link between physical movement and creativity. In particular, new and unexpected kinds of movement enhances creativity. A rigorous schedule, paternalistic management, and sitting in front of a computer all day: these things are part of the old workplace and they zap creativity!

7. Telework nonsense.

We can talk all day about why telework sucks. Generally, the idea goes like this: some employees get to work from home and others are forced to come to the office. How does this affect job performance? It creates jealousy, “us vs. them” attitudes, and more rules to follow and enforce. How unproductive!

8. Coping with cubicles.

Here’s a great little whitepaper about coping with cubicle life. Cubicles are universally despised. Can’t we do better than this? It’s 2011 and we carry computers in our pockets! We’re not talking about eliminating the office. We have to rethink the office and give employees the tools to work wherever and whenever they need to, as long as the work gets done.

9. Burnout blues.

Are your employees engaged? Do they love what they do? Are they producing amazing results and delivering outstanding customer service? Or are they burnt out? Here is great testimonial video from a manager who set her employees free and was surprised by what happened next.

This is a short list and we know you have more to add. Tell us in the comments what workplace issues keep you from doing your job well.

(Hey, thanks for reading! We’d love to help your organization become a Results-Only Work Environment. Contact us about training options.)

 

  • Emily

    Cali & Jody, great post! And being able to quantify all these 9 ways to show businesses how they are losing $ and losing out is so important.  Love all the work you guys are doing/have done with ROWE.   
    -Emily

    • http://twitter.com/StaceyMSwanson staceyswanson

      Emily- Thank you! We love what we do as well.  And, quantifying the $ for businesses really gets their attention.  Who wouldn’t want a culture that focuses on RESULTS?  Go ROWE!

      • Lily

        Although my husband has been trying to show his co-workers and supervisors how efficient focus on results, rather than time, can be, the company has decided to throw more employees back to the Dark Ages and make them hourly, punch-in-punch-out workers.  They say that it’s to save money.  Yeah – we’ll see how *that* works for them!

      • http://twitter.com/StaceyMSwanson staceyswanson

        Lily-
        How awful for them!  A non-trusting culture is definitely NOT the way to go.

      • Concerned Employee

        I got the same experience. My company decided to change the status from salary to hourly. I have never seen people so angry during our *training* in how to punch the clock. They felt denigrated and insulted. The morale reached the lowest point. But the company announced this change as a great thing which would bring happiness and they think productivity will double. They said that many companies are changing to hourly basis and they are realizing that that is the way of the future.
        The employees think that this is a recipe for failure for everybody. 

      • http://twitter.com/caliressler Cali Ressler

        Switching to an hourly pay foundation is the way of the future?!  Does your company know it’s 2011? :)   I’ll bet the group *was* extremely frustrated and angry during the training on how to punch the clock. 

        Double productivity now that everyone is punching the clock?  Is this April Fools’ Day?

  • Anonymous

    Fear and need to control along with unstated personal issues will always be the main roadblock to implementing rowe.

    • http://twitter.com/StaceyMSwanson staceyswanson

      Wyatt- Yes, some people are resistant to the change that ROWE brings.  When we work with clients that want to implement ROWE, we make sure we support those that need a little extra help along the way.  The group that is resistant to ROWE will either come around once they see success for others, or they will change jobs to a traditional work environment.  In most cases, they come around once they see first hand the benefits of ROWE.

  • Anonymous

    Comparing people in the office to other people in the form of performance reviews, job evaluations, scoring systems or other nonsense.

    Work is not like baseball, where the rules of the game are so well defined that it makes sense to keep track of stats. Comparing people only belittles them. You can’t measure someone’s worth as a human being, only how well they meet the results defined for them.

    • http://twitter.com/StaceyMSwanson staceyswanson

      Robby- Agreed! Love your comments.  Each person should be evaluated based on their results and results that are specific for them. 

    • Christy Runningen

      And…doesn’t everyone have their own strengths and style?  As long as everyone is ethical, is one person’s approach to getting the results better than someone else’s?  Don’t we WANT diversity of thought?

  • Kimber sullivan

    Managers will need help to make the paradigm shift of defining results and letting go of how people get to the results.
    Though I agree commuting is bad, lone-rangering is also bad.  And I have seen the temptation to rely too much on email (because it is easier), making interpersonal interaction difficult and leading to tremendous misunderstandings.  Phone calls help, but there’s something important that happens when a team is in the same room together, comfortable with each other, working things out. 
    Rethink? Yes.  Throw it ALL out?  No.

    • http://twitter.com/StaceyMSwanson staceyswanson

      Kimber-
      In a ROWE, face to face can still happen. It happens when it is needed to achieve the results- not because someone has a preference or a belief that face to face is better. Are there times when emails go back and forth a zillion times when a simple 3 minute phone call when bring clarity? Absolutely. The focus is understanding what you are working to achieve and then identifying what type of communication will get you there.

      • KellyK

        I actually think that the more freedom people have over their time, the more they’ll gravitate toward the most efficient forms of communication.  If it takes 2 hours worth of e-mails to accomplish a goal, versus a 3-minute phone call, that extra time doesn’t “hurt” when you’re still judged by the time spent in your seat at the office. You just have to find somethign else to do with that time, after all.  But if you’re knocking out work tasks between grocery shopping and picking up your kids, it’s much more in your best interest to be as efficient as possible.

      • http://twitter.com/caliressler Cali Ressler

        Agreed. In training sessions pre-ROWE, when we ask teams “Who owns your time between 8am and 5pm Monday through Friday?”, people always say “the company” or “my boss”.  Our pre-ROWE survey of the perceptions of the culture show that communication is guarded and behavior in the culture is reactive.

        Post-implementation, when asked the same question about owning time, employees say “I own my time *all* the time.” Coincidentally, the post-implementation survey results always show communication being described as open and leadership behavior shifting to being more proactive. 

        In the traditional system of work, no one is forced to be efficient – in processes, in communication, etc.  But when you’re weighing things against your own time – a non-renewable resource – decisions are much different.

  • Anonymous

    Rowe also brings accountability into sharper focus, which necessitates managers actually knowing what they expect from people.  Doing head counts and micromanaging cubicles is easier-at least until results are required!

    • http://twitter.com/StaceyMSwanson staceyswanson

      Wyatt- TOTALLY agree! Years ago I had a manager walk around every afternoon at 4:55 to make note of who was present and who wasn’t. It was easy. It didn’t matter if we were working or mentally checked out. She wanted to physically see the HR department on-site.  I call that maddening!

      Switching to a results-only work environment definitely requires dialogue between managers and employees to be crystal clear about results and expectations.  In our training sessions, we help get those conversations on the right track because it is key to the success of a ROWE implementation.

  • http://getimants.co.uk getimants

    Great post – love it!
    Large organizations are governed by rules, guidelines, codes putting systems over individuals (read: small cog in a big system) and worst of all this is generally accepted mindset. Large companies also usually attracts the same kind of “corporate” thinkers and becomes a vicious circle.
    The real problem, I think, is education, since in classrooms the same principles prevail.
    I think that creativity, productivity and … should be taught, nurtured and embraced from the first steps of a child – family -> school -> university -> work place and ….

    • http://twitter.com/caliressler Cali Ressler

      Yes! The education arena is starting to see that they have quite an ability to shape a future that’s focused on results. We are working with educational institutions now to implement the ROWE mindset – did you happen to see our blog post a few months back on Prairie Lakes Area Education Agency (PLAEA)? http://www.gorowe.com/2011/08/25/prairie-lakes-education-agency-going-rowe/

      More news coming soon about other clients of ours in education that we’re bringing through the ROWE training process. Very, very exciting!

    • http://twitter.com/caliressler Cali Ressler

      Yes! The education arena is starting to see that they have quite an ability to shape a future that’s focused on results. We are working with educational institutions now to implement the ROWE mindset – did you happen to see our blog post a few months back on Prairie Lakes Area Education Agency (PLAEA)? http://www.gorowe.com/2011/08/25/prairie-lakes-education-agency-going-rowe/

      More news coming soon about other clients of ours in education that we’re bringing through the ROWE training process. Very, very exciting!

  • http://blog.conmergence.com ed_dodds

    Computerworld’s 2012 Best Places to Work in IT bestplaces@computerworld.com https://web.questback.com/idg/bpnoms2012/ What has “Place” got to do with “Organization”?

    • http://twitter.com/caliressler Cali Ressler

      Absolutely nothing, Ed.  Work isn’t a place you go, it’s something you do – how many times have we said it?!  We can always count on you to catch these kinds of things and ‘get’ why they’re so incredibly absurd. Enough with the talk of *place*!!

    • http://twitter.com/caliressler Cali Ressler

      Absolutely nothing, Ed.  Work isn’t a place you go, it’s something you do – how many times have we said it?!  We can always count on you to catch these kinds of things and ‘get’ why they’re so incredibly absurd. Enough with the talk of *place*!!

  • http://twitter.com/ToscanoAdvisors JVT and DTM

    Excellent article. I especially agree with the burnout and stressing flexibility. I’ve talked to many organizations about how to implement ROWE or other similar strategies. 

    • http://twitter.com/StaceyMSwanson staceyswanson

      Glad you liked the article!  In today’s world, burnout can be can be a huge problem. That’s why we love what we do- bringing an authentic Results-only Work Environment to organizations and giving people control over their lives. Go ROWE!

  • http://jameseckvahl.wordpress.com Jameseckvahl

    Early in my career I was telling my boss about how hard I had been working on a project.  His told me “that’s your problem you confuse hard work with results”.  That remark changed my management stlye, and still positively impacts my career.

    • http://twitter.com/caliressler Cali Ressler

      Love it.  Thanks for sharing!  That’s definitely one of those comments that makes you stop and think.  We’re so used to saying “But I tried so hard!” or “I’ve been working on this for days!”  What you’ve shared is something other readers can remember every time they find themselves wanting to spotlight their effort…

  • Sean Schofield

    The fundamental issue is the “controlism” of bureaucracy. Bureaucracy is great at routinizing, structuring, minimizing variance. Which was fine 100 years ago when those issues were the burning issues of the workplace.

    However, in a modern workplace where you need adaptability, creativity, innovation, and engagement…all these things are inversely related to bureaucracy.